再生スムーズで見たかった映画なので助かりました
ありがとうございます
A.I. [DVD]
24パーセントの割引で¥1,200 -24% ¥1,200 税込
参考価格: ¥1,572 参考価格: ¥1,572¥1,572
他に注記がない場合、参考価格とは、製造業者、卸売業者、輸入代理店(「製造業者」)などの小売業者以外が設定した、商品のカタログなど印刷物で発表された、または製造業者が小売業者に提示する参考価格・推奨小売価格を意味します。ただし、Amazonが製造・販売するデバイスの参考価格については、他に注記が無い場合、個人のお客様向けに最近相当期間表示されていた価格を意味します(注記の内容を含む参考価格の詳細については、該当する商品詳細ページをご確認ください)。なお、割引率の表示は1%毎に行われており小数点以下は四捨五入しています。
詳細はこちら
詳細はこちら
{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"¥1,200","priceAmount":1200.00,"currencySymbol":"¥","integerValue":"1,200","decimalSeparator":null,"fractionalValue":null,"symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"UygnJS00yrJBx9Q35o1VcGqxuUbvZI4V5nbK7XfRBLE%2FN3RREJHzi4qL7w8WXpvXxr4LKjfkNrTTmrupLz5KJ6%2BH9LK6yKcAQf1lsFa60B7tzDnTkAvq5xpQGvEf9w9Y","locale":"ja-JP","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}]}
購入オプションとあわせ買い
フォーマット | ドルビー, 色 |
コントリビュータ | ハーレイ・ジョエル・オスメント, ジュード・ロウ, フランシス・オーコナー, スティーブン・スピルバーグ |
言語 | 日本語, 英語 |
稼働時間 | 2 時間 23 分 |
よく一緒に購入されている商品
この商品をチェックした人はこんな商品もチェックしています
ページ 1 以下のうち 1 最初から観るページ 1 以下のうち 1
商品の説明
スピルバーグが贈る愛と感動のSF超大作 構想から20年。キューブリックの遺志はスピルバーグへと引き継がれた。
デイビットは11歳 体重27キロ 身長137センチ 髪の色、ブラウン その愛は真実なのに その存在は、偽り ”愛”をインプットされて生まれてきたA.I.(人工知能)の少年の、数千年にわたる壮大な旅を描いた物語。 近未来-ついに”愛”をインプットされた少年型ロボット、デイビットが誕生する。 彼を試験的に養子に迎えたスウィントン夫妻は、愛情深いデイビットをいつしか本当の子供のように思い始める。しかし、不治の病に冒されていた実子が奇跡的に回復したことで、デイビットは居場所を失ってしまう。母モニカに愛されたいデイビットは、人間になる方法を求めて旅に出る…。
【映像特典】
・ メイキング(約12分)
登録情報
- アスペクト比 : 1.33:1
- メーカーにより製造中止になりました : いいえ
- 言語 : 日本語, 英語
- 梱包サイズ : 18.03 x 13.76 x 1.48 cm; 83.16 g
- EAN : 4988135804747
- 監督 : スティーブン・スピルバーグ
- メディア形式 : ドルビー, 色
- 時間 : 2 時間 23 分
- 発売日 : 2010/4/21
- 出演 : ハーレイ・ジョエル・オスメント, ジュード・ロウ, フランシス・オーコナー
- 字幕: : 日本語, 英語
- 言語 : 英語 (Dolby Digital 5.1), 日本語 (Dolby Digital 5.1)
- 販売元 : ワーナー・ホーム・ビデオ
- ASIN : B003EVW56E
- 原産国 : 日本
- ディスク枚数 : 1
- Amazon 売れ筋ランキング: - 6,257位DVD (DVDの売れ筋ランキングを見る)
- - 62位外国のファンタジー映画
- - 152位外国のSF映画
- カスタマーレビュー:
イメージ付きのレビュー

4 星
残酷にして、美しいストーリー。
これほどまでに、人間のエゴをあからさまに表現した話は、まだ出会った事はない。前半は、人間の持つ残虐性、そして主人公の少年の姿をしたロボットの悲しさを淡々と描かれている。後半は、主人公が愛を得る為に旅立ち、一気に物語の終わりまで、グイグイ引っ張られる。残酷にして、美しいストーリー。ラストは泣いてしまった。
フィードバックをお寄せいただきありがとうございます
申し訳ありませんが、エラーが発生しました
申し訳ありませんが、レビューを読み込めませんでした
-
トップレビュー
上位レビュー、対象国: 日本
レビューのフィルタリング中に問題が発生しました。後でもう一度試してください。
2023年5月13日に日本でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
ストーリーが好きでまた観たいと思っていて探していたところ、見つけて即購入しました!
届いてすぐに観て大満足です!
注文から発送までも早く、満足です🥰
届いてすぐに観て大満足です!
注文から発送までも早く、満足です🥰
2019年12月4日に日本でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
ライオンが涙する地の果てで自分の正体を知り、「マミィ」とつぶやくところまでが、この映画の本編。
そこから長大な時間を経て、悲しいハッピーエンドへと着地します。
この映画、人類に対するディスリスペクトがハンパない。商用のテクノロジーをあんなに発達させながら、気候変動に対処できずに滅んでしまうんですから。
そこから長大な時間を経て、悲しいハッピーエンドへと着地します。
この映画、人類に対するディスリスペクトがハンパない。商用のテクノロジーをあんなに発達させながら、気候変動に対処できずに滅んでしまうんですから。
2023年9月14日に日本でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
多分、同じ内容の映画だったでしょうがどうしてもキューブリック版が観たかった!だって2001年は人間がAIに勝つけどAIはAIが人間に勝つじゃん、だから×××××が⚪⚪してくれるんじゃん!本作を観れば白い部屋の意味分かるじゃん!だからキューブリック版観たかった!
2020年12月14日に日本でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
AIやロボットが人類と共存できるかを問い掛ける作品はウィル・スミス主演の「アイ・ロボット」等が有名だ。2001年公開の本作は、元々「2001年宇宙の旅」「アイズ・ワイズ・シャット」の巨匠スタンリー・キューブリック監督が手掛ける予定だった企画をスティーブン・スピルバーグ監督が引き継いだ経緯がなるほどと理解できる、極めて近未来への示唆に富む意欲作だろう。
当時「シックス・センス」の子役で一世を風靡したジョエル・オスメントを主役に据え、限りなく人間感情に近付いた子供型AIロボットが人間家族に使い捨てにされる悲哀なるストーリーを綴った作品で、地味ながら記憶に刺さる傑作だ。
我が日本をはじめ、人口減少を移民で穴埋めする先進国の未来は、いずれAIロボット等の力に頼る時代が訪れよう。その時、限りなく人間に近いAIを搭載したロボットが、ペット以上の存在で家庭内に居たら、我々は果たして理性的に対処出来るだろうか? 平気でペットすら使い捨てにする人間がロボットを家族に加えられるのか? 本作の深淵な問い掛けに誰もが言葉を失うだろう。
ジュード・ロウが演じる性的悦楽処理ロボットは、不貞の対象として法的に処罰されるのだろうか?
遠からず人間が自らの生殖機能の退化をテクノロジーで補なおうする時代が訪れたとき、果たして法と倫理観は人類の行為を正しく裁けるだろうか?
リドリー・スコット監督のカルト的名作「ブレード・ランナー」での人造アンドロイド、ジェームズ・キャメロン監督の「T2」でのアーノルド・シュワルツェネッガーの父親像と全く同じ問い掛けをAIに絞ったのが本作だ。
完璧にプログラミングされたAIと不完全な生身の人間に甲乙を着けるほど野暮な選択はないが、それでも近い将来の人類の宿命と言っていい。
先進国が、社会規範やモラルを共有できない移民よりも、従順で機能性の高いAIを優先しない保証は何処にも無いのだ。人類が手にした究極の科学技術とは核兵器やバイオでもなく、人類を完璧に模倣し得るAIなのかも知れない。
地球温暖化を止められず、悦楽に酔いしれて徐々に破滅に向かう人類に警鐘を鳴らす鋭いテーマの本作を、死の間際のキューブリックが題材にしたかった事はなるほど良く解る。
スピルバーグ監督作品の中では余り話題に上らない作品だが、現代人として心して知っておきたい極めて深淵な逸品だろう。
限りなく人間に近付いたAIが家族愛を知ったとき、我々は果たして理性的に対処できるだろうか?自らの志向に合わせて完璧にプログラミングされたAIよりも、血を分けた実の子供を間違いなく愛せるだろうか?
スピルバーグ監督が引き受けたメッセージ性に、やはり凡庸はない。今後は否が応でも、科学技術の利便性と人間の哲学を天秤にかけた重い選択を問われる、そんな時代を生きることになる現代人として観ておきたい、その先端思想が余りに異色過ぎて心に突き刺さる不朽の秀作です。
当時「シックス・センス」の子役で一世を風靡したジョエル・オスメントを主役に据え、限りなく人間感情に近付いた子供型AIロボットが人間家族に使い捨てにされる悲哀なるストーリーを綴った作品で、地味ながら記憶に刺さる傑作だ。
我が日本をはじめ、人口減少を移民で穴埋めする先進国の未来は、いずれAIロボット等の力に頼る時代が訪れよう。その時、限りなく人間に近いAIを搭載したロボットが、ペット以上の存在で家庭内に居たら、我々は果たして理性的に対処出来るだろうか? 平気でペットすら使い捨てにする人間がロボットを家族に加えられるのか? 本作の深淵な問い掛けに誰もが言葉を失うだろう。
ジュード・ロウが演じる性的悦楽処理ロボットは、不貞の対象として法的に処罰されるのだろうか?
遠からず人間が自らの生殖機能の退化をテクノロジーで補なおうする時代が訪れたとき、果たして法と倫理観は人類の行為を正しく裁けるだろうか?
リドリー・スコット監督のカルト的名作「ブレード・ランナー」での人造アンドロイド、ジェームズ・キャメロン監督の「T2」でのアーノルド・シュワルツェネッガーの父親像と全く同じ問い掛けをAIに絞ったのが本作だ。
完璧にプログラミングされたAIと不完全な生身の人間に甲乙を着けるほど野暮な選択はないが、それでも近い将来の人類の宿命と言っていい。
先進国が、社会規範やモラルを共有できない移民よりも、従順で機能性の高いAIを優先しない保証は何処にも無いのだ。人類が手にした究極の科学技術とは核兵器やバイオでもなく、人類を完璧に模倣し得るAIなのかも知れない。
地球温暖化を止められず、悦楽に酔いしれて徐々に破滅に向かう人類に警鐘を鳴らす鋭いテーマの本作を、死の間際のキューブリックが題材にしたかった事はなるほど良く解る。
スピルバーグ監督作品の中では余り話題に上らない作品だが、現代人として心して知っておきたい極めて深淵な逸品だろう。
限りなく人間に近付いたAIが家族愛を知ったとき、我々は果たして理性的に対処できるだろうか?自らの志向に合わせて完璧にプログラミングされたAIよりも、血を分けた実の子供を間違いなく愛せるだろうか?
スピルバーグ監督が引き受けたメッセージ性に、やはり凡庸はない。今後は否が応でも、科学技術の利便性と人間の哲学を天秤にかけた重い選択を問われる、そんな時代を生きることになる現代人として観ておきたい、その先端思想が余りに異色過ぎて心に突き刺さる不朽の秀作です。
2017年12月26日に日本でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
むかーし、友達と見に行きました。かみさんが友達に勧められて見たいというので購入。
内容は安っぽいお涙ちょうだいものなのですが、なぜか目から汗が…。
思い切り泣きたい人におすすめ。
ちなみに、かみさんが勧められていた映画は実は「アイ、ロボット」…ガクッ!
内容は安っぽいお涙ちょうだいものなのですが、なぜか目から汗が…。
思い切り泣きたい人におすすめ。
ちなみに、かみさんが勧められていた映画は実は「アイ、ロボット」…ガクッ!
2016年4月17日に日本でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
面白くなくはないです。
ただ無駄に長い。
特に後半、もっとあっさりの方が絶対感動する。
くどくて正直冷めちゃいました。
ナレーションも(彼ら)の話も説明っぽくて長い。
あんなに具体的な話しなくていいのに。。
ただ無駄に長い。
特に後半、もっとあっさりの方が絶対感動する。
くどくて正直冷めちゃいました。
ナレーションも(彼ら)の話も説明っぽくて長い。
あんなに具体的な話しなくていいのに。。
2021年5月14日に日本でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
勝手に作られたのに邪魔にされ健気にすり寄ろうとしても捨てられ
いいヤツが現れてもいなくなり・・・
これこそ本当の意味で胸糞悪い映画だと思います
いい人がどんなに努力しようとも全く実らないあたりリアリティありまくり
ファンタジーを求める人には視聴しないほうがいいことはわかります
いいヤツが現れてもいなくなり・・・
これこそ本当の意味で胸糞悪い映画だと思います
いい人がどんなに努力しようとも全く実らないあたりリアリティありまくり
ファンタジーを求める人には視聴しないほうがいいことはわかります
他の国からのトップレビュー

William R.
5つ星のうち5.0
"A.I. Artificial Intelligence" – Fiction or Foresight?
2024年1月26日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
"A.I. Artificial Intelligence", or "A.I.", is a Steven Spielberg American science fiction fantasy drama film, released June 29, 2001, loosely based on the 1969 short story "Supertoys Last All Summer Long" by Brian Aldiss; hailed as one of Spielberg's best works and one of the greatest films of all time; set in a futuristic society, the film stars Haley Joel Osment as 'David', a childlike ten-year-old sentient android uniquely programmed with the ability to love who, like 'Pinocchio', wishes to become a 'real boy'; also starring William Hurt as 'Professor Allen Hobby', mastermind of A.I. and David's creator; 'Teddy', an animatronic puppet robotic teddy bear, who serves as David’s sidekick; Frances O'Connor as 'Monica Swinton', David's adoptive mother; Jude Law as 'Gigolo Joe', a true ‘love machine’ sex-toy android; and Jake Thomas as 'Martin Swinton', David's stepbrother.
At the time this movie came out and was first released on DVD, I purchased the 2-disc special edition on March 5, 2002. This is a wonderful and extremely interesting movie, which I have watched many times. The story still fascinates, and it is timeless. This review discusses "spoilers" intended for viewers who have seen the movie and now contemplate its present relevance, with this recommendation to watch the film again.
In today's world, more than 20 years later, I now see everything in a new light, the light of thought-provoking relevance and a message. Now that Artificial Intelligence has become a reality in the forefront of today's news, with Google's and Microsoft's recent implementations; with Turing laureates Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio, and physicist Stephen Hawking and business magnate Elon Musk, and dozens of artificial intelligence experts signing open letters on artificial intelligence, calling for research on how to prevent certain potential "pitfalls"; I see in the movie "A.I. Artificial Intelligence" a tacit revelation of biases of which we are not even aware; elusive flaws in character, committed unwittingly, not by choice; rather, a weakness from an excess of virtue, a guilt of hubris, an overstep in limitations; and I see the concept of potential "pitfalls" in developing artificial intelligence algorithms in the same light as edified by those preeminent experts – Hawking, Hinton and Musk. Moreover, I now view notable science fiction in the light of such luminaries as Jules Verne (Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Seas, pub. 1871), George Orwell (1984, pub. 1949), Isaac Asimov (The Evitable Conflict and I, Robot, pub. 1950), H.G. Wells (World Brain, 1936 – 1938), and Aldous Huxley (Brave New World, pub. 1932), who's olden fiction actually imagined what you might recognize today, as giving credence to a subliminal if not an implied notion of flawed algorithm, prophetically conjured in Spielberg's "A.I.". In a recent interview, Spielberg said of artificial intelligence, "It's got me very nervous; the soul is unimaginable and ineffable; the soul cannot be created by any algorithm; it is just something that exists in all of us; and to lose that because it is being written by machines that we created... that terrifies me."
The story takes place in the distant future of the 22nd century, when rising sea levels from global warming have wiped out 99% of existing cities, reducing the world's population, and mechanical (aka 'mecha') humanoid robots, capable of complex assignments but lacking emotions, have been created as replacements. The movie "AI: Artificial Intelligence" begins with the brilliant scientist 'Professor Allen Hobby' saying, "I believe that my work on mapping the impulse pathways in a single neuron can enable us to construct a mecha of a qualitatively different order. "I propose that we build a robot who can love," and he tells his Cybertronics Corp engineers, "You see, what I’m suggesting is that love will be the key by which they acquire a kind of subconscious never before achieved. An inner world of metaphor, of intuition, of self-motivated reasoning. Of dreams. "Ours will be a perfect child caught in a freeze-frame - always loving, never ill, never changing. With all the childless couples yearning in vain for a license, our little mecha would not only open an entirely new market, it will fill a great human need."
Scholars write that "in the real world, an algorithm is not an objective tool; algorithms are a computer-simulated reflection of encoded human expectations; it is as human as the programmer who codes it, and humans are biased. Algorithms in the real world cannot act on their own. These algorithms are built and designed by humans, and all the input is curated, selected, and created by humans. And they bear the humans' faults. Algorithms are the literal manifestation of “playing by someone else’s rules.” So, algorithms, the underlying process of decision-making in artificial intelligence systems, are imperfect, prone to bias, and make unpredictable decisions that impact the future. The first challenge is implicit bias, which is the unconscious perceptions people have that cloud their thoughts and actions."
In the introduction, rationalizing his creation of an android capable of love, Professor Hobby says, "But in the beginning, didn’t God create Adam to love him?" and this gives us a euphemistic glimpse of his hubris in the creation of an idealized love. As his creation, 'David', a ten-year-old child-like sentient android (mecha) uniquely programmed with the ability to love, becomes self-aware and self-improving, we come to see in retrospect that he is no different from his maker, that Doctor Hobby's subconscious biases are manifest in David's algorithm characteristics of love as egocentric, selfish, adaptive, and obsessive, to the detriment of all else, elusive of every virtue, not by design but by assimilation of the character flaws inherent in the implicit bias corrupting the algorithm written by his maker. David's egoism, resting solely on self-interest, is unmistakably obvious near the conclusion of his quest for love. David finds his way back to Cybertronics and, wandering about, he finds another mecha that looks just like him. Disturbed, David wildly destroys it in a confused and jealous psychopathic rage. Continuing to look around, he finds the different mechanical items that were instrumental in his creation, as well as fully-boxed 'David' and 'Darlene' units for consumer purchase. Confronting Professor Hobby upon discovery, David says, "I thought I was one of a kind," to which Hobby replies, "My son was one of a kind," a reference to modeling David in the exact likeness of Hobby's real-life son that died, "You are the first of a kind," to which David replies, "My brain is falling out," giving further evidence of the instability inherent in the algorithm written by Professor Hobby. We recognize this flawed artificial intelligence only in hindsight because we are beguiled by the illusion of unrequited love. The moral is this, "We must recognize our limits and respect them."
Apropos: The name of Professor Hobby's artificial intelligence engineering firm, 'Cybertronics', has an obscure literary connotation with cryptic allusion to cognitive bias in developing artificial intelligence, raising the question of whether the movie's story is fiction or prescience. Notably, Jules Verne's 1871 classic 'Nautilus submarine' from his novel "Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Seas" became a reality 80 years later in the form of the USS Nautilus (SSN-571) commissioned in 1954. There are many previously mentioned examples of so-called fiction that have become reality. More relevant is the portent of implicit or cognitive bias algorithm given by science fiction writer Isaac Asimov (1920 – 1992) in "The Evitable Conflict" and the "I, Robot" series, both published in 1950, in which the sentient artificial intelligent "Machine" reason that their necessity to humanity is to take control to protect humanity from itself. A prescient warning.
One of the more interesting aspects of Leonardo Da Vinci's inventions and discoveries is that they had no real influence on future generations because they were trapped and kept hidden from everyone until hundreds of years later, after they had already been "re-discovered." He never published any of his findings because some would be considered "heresy" and "blasphemous," and others because he did not want them to fall into the wrong hands. Others because he knew they would not be possible until the far future. A precursor to what Galileo would later undergo, for Galileo was not so wise and was condemned for heresy in 1633 because the Church held that heliocentrism was a "foolish and absurd philosophy, and formally heretical since it explicitly contradicts in many places the sense of Holy Scripture."
“All our knowledge hast its origins in our perceptions … In nature there is no effect without a cause … Experience never errs; it is only your judgments that err by promising themselves effects such as are not caused by your experiments … Science is the observation of things possible, whether present or past; prescience is the knowledge of things which may come to pass.”
― Leonardo da Vinci (b. April 15, 1452, Anchiano, Italy; d. May 2, 1519, Château du Clos Lucé, Chapel of Saint-Hubert, Amboise, France)
Source: The Notebooks of Leonardo da Vinci (1883): published by Jean Paul Richter (1883),
as translated into English by Mrs. R. C. Bell and Edward John Poynter,
XIX Philosophical Maxims. Morals. Polemics and Speculations.
At the time this movie came out and was first released on DVD, I purchased the 2-disc special edition on March 5, 2002. This is a wonderful and extremely interesting movie, which I have watched many times. The story still fascinates, and it is timeless. This review discusses "spoilers" intended for viewers who have seen the movie and now contemplate its present relevance, with this recommendation to watch the film again.
In today's world, more than 20 years later, I now see everything in a new light, the light of thought-provoking relevance and a message. Now that Artificial Intelligence has become a reality in the forefront of today's news, with Google's and Microsoft's recent implementations; with Turing laureates Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio, and physicist Stephen Hawking and business magnate Elon Musk, and dozens of artificial intelligence experts signing open letters on artificial intelligence, calling for research on how to prevent certain potential "pitfalls"; I see in the movie "A.I. Artificial Intelligence" a tacit revelation of biases of which we are not even aware; elusive flaws in character, committed unwittingly, not by choice; rather, a weakness from an excess of virtue, a guilt of hubris, an overstep in limitations; and I see the concept of potential "pitfalls" in developing artificial intelligence algorithms in the same light as edified by those preeminent experts – Hawking, Hinton and Musk. Moreover, I now view notable science fiction in the light of such luminaries as Jules Verne (Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Seas, pub. 1871), George Orwell (1984, pub. 1949), Isaac Asimov (The Evitable Conflict and I, Robot, pub. 1950), H.G. Wells (World Brain, 1936 – 1938), and Aldous Huxley (Brave New World, pub. 1932), who's olden fiction actually imagined what you might recognize today, as giving credence to a subliminal if not an implied notion of flawed algorithm, prophetically conjured in Spielberg's "A.I.". In a recent interview, Spielberg said of artificial intelligence, "It's got me very nervous; the soul is unimaginable and ineffable; the soul cannot be created by any algorithm; it is just something that exists in all of us; and to lose that because it is being written by machines that we created... that terrifies me."
The story takes place in the distant future of the 22nd century, when rising sea levels from global warming have wiped out 99% of existing cities, reducing the world's population, and mechanical (aka 'mecha') humanoid robots, capable of complex assignments but lacking emotions, have been created as replacements. The movie "AI: Artificial Intelligence" begins with the brilliant scientist 'Professor Allen Hobby' saying, "I believe that my work on mapping the impulse pathways in a single neuron can enable us to construct a mecha of a qualitatively different order. "I propose that we build a robot who can love," and he tells his Cybertronics Corp engineers, "You see, what I’m suggesting is that love will be the key by which they acquire a kind of subconscious never before achieved. An inner world of metaphor, of intuition, of self-motivated reasoning. Of dreams. "Ours will be a perfect child caught in a freeze-frame - always loving, never ill, never changing. With all the childless couples yearning in vain for a license, our little mecha would not only open an entirely new market, it will fill a great human need."
Scholars write that "in the real world, an algorithm is not an objective tool; algorithms are a computer-simulated reflection of encoded human expectations; it is as human as the programmer who codes it, and humans are biased. Algorithms in the real world cannot act on their own. These algorithms are built and designed by humans, and all the input is curated, selected, and created by humans. And they bear the humans' faults. Algorithms are the literal manifestation of “playing by someone else’s rules.” So, algorithms, the underlying process of decision-making in artificial intelligence systems, are imperfect, prone to bias, and make unpredictable decisions that impact the future. The first challenge is implicit bias, which is the unconscious perceptions people have that cloud their thoughts and actions."
In the introduction, rationalizing his creation of an android capable of love, Professor Hobby says, "But in the beginning, didn’t God create Adam to love him?" and this gives us a euphemistic glimpse of his hubris in the creation of an idealized love. As his creation, 'David', a ten-year-old child-like sentient android (mecha) uniquely programmed with the ability to love, becomes self-aware and self-improving, we come to see in retrospect that he is no different from his maker, that Doctor Hobby's subconscious biases are manifest in David's algorithm characteristics of love as egocentric, selfish, adaptive, and obsessive, to the detriment of all else, elusive of every virtue, not by design but by assimilation of the character flaws inherent in the implicit bias corrupting the algorithm written by his maker. David's egoism, resting solely on self-interest, is unmistakably obvious near the conclusion of his quest for love. David finds his way back to Cybertronics and, wandering about, he finds another mecha that looks just like him. Disturbed, David wildly destroys it in a confused and jealous psychopathic rage. Continuing to look around, he finds the different mechanical items that were instrumental in his creation, as well as fully-boxed 'David' and 'Darlene' units for consumer purchase. Confronting Professor Hobby upon discovery, David says, "I thought I was one of a kind," to which Hobby replies, "My son was one of a kind," a reference to modeling David in the exact likeness of Hobby's real-life son that died, "You are the first of a kind," to which David replies, "My brain is falling out," giving further evidence of the instability inherent in the algorithm written by Professor Hobby. We recognize this flawed artificial intelligence only in hindsight because we are beguiled by the illusion of unrequited love. The moral is this, "We must recognize our limits and respect them."
Apropos: The name of Professor Hobby's artificial intelligence engineering firm, 'Cybertronics', has an obscure literary connotation with cryptic allusion to cognitive bias in developing artificial intelligence, raising the question of whether the movie's story is fiction or prescience. Notably, Jules Verne's 1871 classic 'Nautilus submarine' from his novel "Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Seas" became a reality 80 years later in the form of the USS Nautilus (SSN-571) commissioned in 1954. There are many previously mentioned examples of so-called fiction that have become reality. More relevant is the portent of implicit or cognitive bias algorithm given by science fiction writer Isaac Asimov (1920 – 1992) in "The Evitable Conflict" and the "I, Robot" series, both published in 1950, in which the sentient artificial intelligent "Machine" reason that their necessity to humanity is to take control to protect humanity from itself. A prescient warning.
One of the more interesting aspects of Leonardo Da Vinci's inventions and discoveries is that they had no real influence on future generations because they were trapped and kept hidden from everyone until hundreds of years later, after they had already been "re-discovered." He never published any of his findings because some would be considered "heresy" and "blasphemous," and others because he did not want them to fall into the wrong hands. Others because he knew they would not be possible until the far future. A precursor to what Galileo would later undergo, for Galileo was not so wise and was condemned for heresy in 1633 because the Church held that heliocentrism was a "foolish and absurd philosophy, and formally heretical since it explicitly contradicts in many places the sense of Holy Scripture."
“All our knowledge hast its origins in our perceptions … In nature there is no effect without a cause … Experience never errs; it is only your judgments that err by promising themselves effects such as are not caused by your experiments … Science is the observation of things possible, whether present or past; prescience is the knowledge of things which may come to pass.”
― Leonardo da Vinci (b. April 15, 1452, Anchiano, Italy; d. May 2, 1519, Château du Clos Lucé, Chapel of Saint-Hubert, Amboise, France)
Source: The Notebooks of Leonardo da Vinci (1883): published by Jean Paul Richter (1883),
as translated into English by Mrs. R. C. Bell and Edward John Poynter,
XIX Philosophical Maxims. Morals. Polemics and Speculations.

continue2062
5つ星のうち5.0
love the movie
2023年11月10日にカナダでレビュー済みAmazonで購入
Glad to find this old gem. Love the movie and the quality of the disc. It was reasonably priced as well.

Johann Tissen
5つ星のうち5.0
Super Qualität
2024年1月30日にドイツでレビュー済みAmazonで購入
Super Nostalgiesche Film

Lolita
5つ星のうち5.0
Dvd
2023年12月19日にフランスでレビュー済みAmazonで購入
Bon DVD, bien emballé

Samanta Amerio
5つ星のうち5.0
Bellissimo.
2023年11月9日にイタリアでレビュー済みAmazonで購入
Film veramente bello e commovente (io avevo addirittura ancora la versione in VHS, che purtroppo non si vedeva più nel mio vecchio videoregistratore). Una rivisitazione della favola di Collodi in versione moderna targata Spielberg.