Having immersed myself recently in Heidegger's interpretation of Aristotle and the Metaphysics Theta, I deeply appreciate Beere's marvelous work on this crucial chapter of The Metaphysics.
The basic issue is the concept of energeia, and our translations of the term as 'activity' and 'actuality' e.g. from page 3:
"`Activity' and `actuality' are even now the two standard translations of `energeia.' Sometimes `energeia' can be translated only by a word for doing like `activity,' while `actuality' and related words yield absurdity. For instance, when Aristotle says that pleasure is unimpeded energeia, he must mean that it is unimpeded activity, not unimpeded actuality."
But why must he mean that? Following Heidegger's interpretation of Aristotle, fully actual Dasein-in-the-world is an almost exact definition of pleasure and not absurd in the least. It is the modern distortion of `pleasure' to `hedonism' as we understand it (a very different concept to the Greeks) that forces such an `absurdity'. In fact, the opposite holds: the translation of energeia as `activity' produces absurdity. Unimpeded activity is mere self-indulgence, the opposite of Aristotle's intention in the Nichomachean Ethics as I read it, and of Greek ethics and philosophy in toto.
Later in the book Beere examines this example in further detail. I agree with the point he makes concerning energeia, but find the example used to be confusing, and does not illustrate the point clearly to me. His argument concerning Theta 6. taken as a whole, I find to be convincing.
The final piece of the puzzle is his pointing out that 'actuality' derives from the Latin 'in actus', which is more closely related to 'activity' than one first suspects.
Seeking clarity in Aristotelian metaphysics, I have discovered further depths and wonders I had not anticipated (I was just looking for another point of view than Heidegger's). Beere and Aristotle do not disappoint.
プライム無料体験をお試しいただけます
プライム無料体験で、この注文から無料配送特典をご利用いただけます。
非会員 | プライム会員 | |
---|---|---|
通常配送 | ¥410 - ¥450* | 無料 |
お急ぎ便 | ¥510 - ¥550 | |
お届け日時指定便 | ¥510 - ¥650 |
*Amazon.co.jp発送商品の注文額 ¥2,000以上は非会員も無料
無料体験はいつでもキャンセルできます。30日のプライム無料体験をぜひお試しください。

無料のKindleアプリをダウンロードして、スマートフォン、タブレット、またはコンピューターで今すぐKindle本を読むことができます。Kindleデバイスは必要ありません。
ウェブ版Kindleなら、お使いのブラウザですぐにお読みいただけます。
携帯電話のカメラを使用する - 以下のコードをスキャンし、Kindleアプリをダウンロードしてください。
Doing and Being: An Interpretation of Aristotle's Metaphysics Theta (Oxford Aristotle Studies) ペーパーバック – 2012/4/7
英語版
Jonathan Beere
(著)
{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"¥7,857","priceAmount":7857.00,"currencySymbol":"¥","integerValue":"7,857","decimalSeparator":null,"fractionalValue":null,"symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"eu5GpkcMj8Has3EreWfgs30LFsSjvUj0nUBl0rbYa%2FPLVZcKa2OgjOlLcf3fBhj8hZu772DSgxF6GNDQZybgf6n2USNSwTrXAbV0Jk4O6I%2FQShMOu%2FmCuT%2BhbuehxrCAxjsskKOyDyc%3D","locale":"ja-JP","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}]}
購入オプションとあわせ買い
Doing and Being confronts the problem of how to understand two central concepts of Aristotle's philosophy: energeia and dunamis. While these terms seem ambiguous between actuality/potentiality and activity/capacity, Aristotle did not intend them to be so. Through a careful and detailed reading of Metaphysics Theta, Beere argues that we can solve the problem by rejecting both "actuality" and "activity" as translations of energeia, and by working out an analogical conception of energeia. This approach enables Beere to discern a hitherto unnoticed connection between Plato's Sophist and Aristotle's Metaphysics Theta, and to give satisfying interpretations of the major claims that Aristotle makes in Metaphysics Theta, the claim that energeia is prior in being to capacity (Theta 8) and the claim that any eternal principle must be perfectly good (Theta 9).
- 本の長さ382ページ
- 言語英語
- 出版社Oxford University Press, USA
- 発売日2012/4/7
- 寸法23.4 x 15.6 x 2 cm
- ISBN-10019965204X
- ISBN-13978-0199652044
商品の説明
レビュー
Jonathan Beere's Doing and Being is a thorough, well informed and insightful chapter-by-chapter commentary on the bulk of Aristotle's Metaphysics Theta . ― Boris Hennig, Philosophical Quarterly
an excellent textual analysis ― Anna Marmadoro, Mind
an excellent textual analysis ― Anna Marmadoro, Mind
著者について
Jonathan Beere is a member of the Department of Philosophy, as well as the Graduate School of Ancient Philosophy and the Excellence Cluster Topoi, at the Humboldt Universität zu Berlin. He was previously Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Chicago.
登録情報
- 出版社 : Oxford University Press, USA; Reprint版 (2012/4/7)
- 発売日 : 2012/4/7
- 言語 : 英語
- ペーパーバック : 382ページ
- ISBN-10 : 019965204X
- ISBN-13 : 978-0199652044
- 寸法 : 23.4 x 15.6 x 2 cm
- Amazon 売れ筋ランキング: - 188,164位洋書 (洋書の売れ筋ランキングを見る)
- - 417位Philosophy Metaphysics
- - 445位Greek & Roman Philosophy
- - 448位Metaphysics
- カスタマーレビュー:
著者について
著者をフォローして、新作のアップデートや改善されたおすすめを入手してください。

著者の本をもっと発見したり、よく似た著者を見つけたり、著者のブログを読んだりしましょう
カスタマーレビュー
星5つ中5つ
5つのうち5つ
3グローバルレーティング
評価はどのように計算されますか?
全体的な星の評価と星ごとの割合の内訳を計算するために、単純な平均は使用されません。その代わり、レビューの日時がどれだけ新しいかや、レビューアーがAmazonで商品を購入したかどうかなどが考慮されます。また、レビューを分析して信頼性が検証されます。
他の国からのトップレビュー

Brendan M. Funnell
5つ星のうち5.0
Preliminary observations and difficulties
2011年1月13日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入

Jason
5つ星のうち5.0
Great Book
2016年6月5日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
Great book